The moment Canada stops renting its future
$1.7B for world-class researchers. Now let's make sure we own what they build.
The first time I felt Canada’s innovation problem in my bones, I was in a glass-walled conference room off Sand Hill Road. A venture partner—nice suit, nicer smile—was praising Canadian talent. Our engineers. Our labs. Our papers. Then came the shrug, the one you can hear across the room: “You’re great at making the thing. We’re great at owning the thing.”
I flew home with that condescension stuck to my ribs like damp fog off the lake.
On December 9th 2025, in Montréal, Industry Minister Mélanie Joly made that line harder to deliver with a straight face. She announced $1.7 billion for the Global Impact+ Research Talent Initiative—100 research chairs at up to $1 million a year each, plus 900 early-career researchers building teams around them in AI, quantum, biotech, climate tech. This isn’t the old penny-ante NSERC grants averaging $47,000, barely enough to keep the lights on while American NSF labs get $200,000+ starting cheques. This is real firepower.
Celebrate it. And then don’t confuse fuel with a destination.
Canada doesn’t have a research problem.
We have a commercialization problem. I’m saying that as someone who used to find where organizations create value and someone else captures it. Canada’s leakage is ownership.
The proof is brutal. IRPP researchers tracked U.S. patents with at least one Canadian inventor and found the share transferred to foreign firms on the date of issue more than doubled over two decades—from 18 percent to 45 percent. On the date of issue. Not years later after some acquisition. The ink dries, the deed changes hands.
We pay for the training camp, buy the gear, hire the coaches—and our best players sign with the Yankees on draft day.
Here’s the story that still stings. On June 12, 2017, Aidan Gomez—then 23, University of Toronto alum, Google intern—co-authored “Attention Is All You Need”. That PDF birthed the transformer architecture, the mathematical engine underneath ChatGPT, Google search, every chip Nvidia sells. That paper became the foundation of a multi-trillion-dollar industry built and owned almost entirely outside Canada.
Canada helped train the mind that wrote the blueprint. Gomez came home and built Cohere, now worth $7 billion. Geoffrey Hinton won the Nobel for neural nets from the same labs. But the value? Mostly scaled abroad.
Pride doesn’t pay doctors.
The Chain We Pretend Not to See
Here’s the chain: Ideas leave. Companies follow. Headquarters move. Tax revenue disappears. And that missing money? It shows up as longer wait times, understaffed operating rooms, MRI machines that Thunder Bay can’t afford.
You can’t run a first-world healthcare system on someone else’s tax base. Not forever. The OECD projects Canada dead last in G7 GDP per capita growth to 2060. When high-value companies get built and owned elsewhere, we lose the boring, essential capacity to fund the things that keep a country livable.
Bringing world-class researchers is essential. But if we don’t change the ownership structure underneath, we’re just training a bigger diaspora.
Two Fixes. Not Twenty.
So while Joly’s $1.7 billion is still warm on the press release, here are two fixes.
First: change the default. When public money funds the research, Canada should get first crack at owning or licensing the IP. Not case-by-case negotiations. Not maybe-someday partnerships. Standard terms that anchor commercialization here. Will some multinationals balk? Let them. If the research is good enough—and it is—they’ll come anyway. They need the talent more than we need their validation.
Second: build the people who build companies. We don’t just need researchers—we need the operators who know how to scale. Use government purchasing power to create domestic customers for Canadian innovation. Make it easier for Canadian expats who’ve scaled firms abroad to move home and do it here. Reward companies that keep headquarters and IP in Canada.
The partner in that conference room wasn’t wrong. Their system is built to capture value. Ours creates it, then acts surprised when someone else collects the cheque.
We’ve Been Renting Out Our Future
But Joly’s bet just changed the equation. We have the fuel. Now we need to stop leaking it—and start building the engine that keeps the value here.
I don’t want my kids growing up in a country that invents the world’s next transformer and rents it back at retail. I don’t want the next generation of Canadian founders flying home with that same condescension stuck to their ribs.
That’s why I’m building for Canada. Not out of nostalgia. Out of refusal to let another generation rent back what we invented.
We’ve been renting out our future. It’s time to own it.




one thing I'd add is the compensation & taxation gap between US and Canada. Yes, research is important, but it's really the top engineers that build out of those great research. Many senior & staff engineers in Canada have compensation range that of a junior/intermediate engineer in the US, and on top of that face higher marginal tax on average.
You've made very valid points, @bryan. As discussed, I also believe that the US has done a much better job at integrating and capturing its Indo-American talent, which goes on to lead all billion-dollar companies like Google, Microsoft, etc, and we haven't made a bridge between that, which is a big untapped market.